Posts Tagged ‘anwr drilling’
ANWR drilling is a sore subject. It’s constantly discussed and debated, particularly during elections. To understand the debate the overall issue of ANWR drilling, the impacts of drilling there must be understood.
ANWR is the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It’s a little more than 19 million acres in the North Slope in Alaska. In 1960 the government named it a protected area and has added even more land since then. Part of the purpose for protecting the area is to protect the resources there. That seems a bit odd since while protected the resources can’t be exploited. Why protect resources that can never be used?
When the Trans-Alaska Pipeline was built ANWR drilling became a hot issue for environmentalists. Their hope was to preserve areas that hadn’t been spoiled, in their opinion, by the pipeline. It took place in 1976. In 1980 President Jimmy Carter signed into law an act that created over 104 million acres of national parks in Alaska. It allowed drilling in ANWR but only with congressional approval. Both pro and anti drilling people went into action. One wanted to remove the drilling possibility. The other wanted to cut down the amount of protected land.
In 1986 the Fish and Wildlife Service suggested swapping some land with Eskimos in order to open ANWR drilling. But the anti drilling people said that would impact caribou herds. Canada and the US signed a treaty to give each nation a say in what was done in the area. That effectively ended any action on the 1986 recommendation.
There continues to be an argument over drilling in ANWR. Those for it say the oil and natural gas are needed. Not only will it create a larger world supply, but it would help America drastically decrease the oil imported from foreign sources. What many people don’t realize is that a vast majority of US oil comes from Russia and South America. Both are rather stable oil suppliers.
Those against ANWR drilling continue to point to environmental concerns. The same types of people fight to stop nuclear power plants, which would reduce the need for oil and coal plants the same people say pollute.
ANWR drilling will continue to be a major discussion. Even if drilling begins, people will try to stop it and the cycle will continue.
The ANWR drilling issue is a complex one. The subject is ANWR oil drilling and people’s opinions of it. It’s one of the hottest topics around so read on to see what people think. Our country needs its oil. The world needs oil. Most of the world economy runs on oil. Many people believe if alternative fuels could be found for cars, the dependence on oil would end. But people use heating oil too.
In addition, there is the motor oil that even alternative fuel burning cars require. But ANWR oil drilling has an even bigger impact on another segment of people’s lives. Many common household items are made with petroleum based products. That includes electronics from computers to televisions. Plastic components and some of the internal components are made with oil.
People speak and write a lot about ANWR oil drilling. This first one is taken from a blog. The writer claims drilling there won’t produce much oil. He goes on to say it will be over 10 years before any oil comes from there. That’s a misrepresentation of ANWR oil drilling. The drilling process will be quick if there’s little oil there. The impact to the environment will be quite low. That 10 year or more argument – we can’t get it now – has been made since the 70’s. We’ll never get anywhere if we don’t get moving. If something never starts, it will never produce. Other people express an anti ANWR oil drilling opinion.
The longer we use oil the longer we need oil, so we better stop using it now. The answer is this: why bathe tonight, we’re going to die some day. Then we won’t need to bathe, so lets save water by not washing. Some people make weak arguments for ANWR oil drilling. One man said: I want my SUV. I want to know I’m the big car on the road, not some tiny import. A reply: Become a trucker. Then you’re in a big rig, the largest vehicle on the road. Think about how it will feel to make SUV drivers feel small. One guide from Alaska said that when it comes to ANWR oil drilling over 80% of the oil drilled in America goes to Japan. Why should we drill more? That’s easy to answer. Just because a farmer sells his food doesn’t mean he should stop growing it. The debate over ANWR oil drilling won’t end. What’s your opinion? Inevitabley,the anwr oil drilling debates continues…
ANWR drilling is a sore subject. It’s constantly discussed and debated, particularly during elections. It takes a decent understanding of all the issues involved to join the discussion.
The anwar drilling issue starts in the beautiful state of Alaska. ANWR is the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It’s a little more than 19 million acres in the North Slope in Alaska. In 1960 the government named it a protected area and has added even more land since then. Part of the purpose for protecting the area is to protect the resources there. That seems a bit odd since while protected the resources can’t be exploited What good are resources that can never be tapped?
When the Trans-Alaska Pipeline was built ANWR drilling became a hot issue for environmentalists. They were interested in protected areas where the pipeline didn’t reach. This was done in 1976. In 1980 when president Carter created 104 million acres of Alaskan national parks, he blocked drilling in ANWR unless Congress approved it. Both pro and anti drilling people went into action. One wanted to remove the drilling possibility. The other wanted to cut down the amount of protected land.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service recommended opening ANWR drilling in November of 1986. It proposed a trade of ANWR land for land owned by Eskimo tribes to accomplish this. But conservationists worried that caribou herds would be cut of from their birthing grounds. The US entered an agreement with Canada that both countries would have a say in drilling the area, which squashed the Wildlife Service’s recommendation.
The debate over ANWR drilling continues. Those for drilling point to the negative impact of US dependence on foreign oil. Most of the oil the US imports, however, comes from relatively stable areas such as Russia.
Anti ANWR drilling people stick to the environmental argument. The same types of people fight to stop nuclear power plants, which would reduce the need for oil and coal plants the same people say pollute.
It seems the debate over ANWR drilling will never come to an end.
The issue of drilling ANWaR brings out people’s desire to debate. They enjoy expressing themselves about it.
President Carter was responsible for giving ANWaR protective status. But he also stipulated that drilling could take place if Congress gave the OK. The pursuit of that approval is often the issue. Congressmen have to face this every time they run for office.
Here’s a guy with an anti drilling ANWaR opinion. We need places like ANWaR in this country. Don’t ruin it.
Other people are all for drilling ANWaR. They disagree that it will harm the wilderness. One of them wrote: The wilderness will still be there if ANWaR is drilled. The environmentalists had to come up with a what if issue, because they couldn’t prove any harm. What if the caribou can’t reach their mating grounds because of drilling? They’ll walk around the equipment. Nature always finds a way.
Herds of Buffalo didn’t find a way. Now we have no buffalo.
John McCain mentioned drilling ANWaR in his two runs for Presidential office. He was all for it as long as it was done in a way that wouldn’t harm the environment.
John McCain is welcome to vote in favor of drilling ANWaR.
Some people get angry over the subject of drilling ANWaR. Let me come look around your home. You may not understand what I want, but I found something in front of the stairs that lead upstairs to the bedrooms. Now I set up drilling equipment there. Go find an apartment, because you won’t be able to get to the bedroom.
The answer is: No, you wouldn’t set up drilling equipment in someone’s house. You’d be arrested for trespassing. People aren’t animals. Homes aren’t the wilderness.
The world needs more and more oil so this issue isn’t going to go away. Would you allow drilling ANWaR if it were your decision?
http://drillingnow.com/